Better an Injury, Than Do Evil.
In one of philosophies about life, Socrates says that it is better to suffer an injury, even a fatal injury, than it is to do something evil. This is one of his philosophies that touch on life and the aspect of human integrity which for sure can be consented with in totality for its scope in condemning evil deeds in the society. In this philosophy, Socrates gives his personal view and plain condemnation of the vice of evil and how detrimental he perceives the consequences of doing evil. He uses the most out ward and common pain that a number of people understand to express the effects doing evil by man. In this he uses a fatal injury as a suitable comparison to doing evil.
Can't complete your paper?
Need a quick, creative solution?
Never too late to get it done by our prosWrite My Paper
Bearing in mind just how painful a slight injury leave alone amore serious fatal injury, Socrates effectively instills fear to committing evil. The philosophy is of practical application especially to the youths to which Socrates usually used to address. Socrates made his audience the young people to whom he could easily use figurative and wisely composed philosophies in mounding their behaviors. The philosophy is practical in that as human beings we can avoid doing evil deeds if they ultimately subject us to greater suffering later more like in a proverbial context human being are to avoid what will result in great suffering even if it appears buttered initially. In fact no one would knowingly subject himself to an evil deed which is compared to a fatal injury pain bearing in mind that it could even result to death.
Plato Idea or Forms and Aristotle’s Idea of Forms
Plato believes on reality varied greatly from the Aristotle’s ideologies. Plato had an imaginary idea on the existence of an ideal world which was beyond the physical earth that human beings live in. he described the earth on which we live as full of unevenness, lacking perfection, and greatly filled with impurities. To Plato all this has occupied the position of the ideal world which is beyond us. He also believed that the Forms in the current world are just but an imitation of the real world Forms in a disorderly way. Aristotle on the other hand argued that a person cannot tell the type of interaction that occurs between the form we perceive and the ideal Forms. He challenged how the ideal form related to material Forms that exist on earth being greatly encompassed by physical imperfection. The imitation ideal claim for the real and the world of imaginary brought about by Plato was therefore considered wrong and one that couldn’t be proved. Plato’s argument also failed to prove these Forms in the material world.
Due to the fact that Aristotle’s Theory on Forms was greatly integrated with his belief biological and scientific development of forms such as plants and animal the argument seems to have a stronger base and therefore the ultimate nature of reality. Plato’s argument also missed the necessary supporting evidence.
Aristotle’s doctrine of Entelechy
According to Aristotle things have the potential to change to different forms. in that aspect for a change to occur it must begin to ultimately become what it is destined to be. It is therefore undisputable that a child begins to grow when conception has occurred to become an adult upon growth. A man or a woman begins by being a boy or girl for them to later become elderly.
It is therefore important that a child in the mothers womb be accorded dignity for it will begin by being a fetus in order to become an adult. Abortion should therefore be prohibited for it leads to what will become a human being. Elderly people should not also be subjected to euthanasia for they are the same people who first began by being young but have now become old.