Archetypal montages can be described as a state of graduation in a sequential pattern of scenes with the elapse of time in the development of certain feelings that are readily and easily observable. Spectacle is a ward commonly used in reference to memorable appearances created in a given event or occasion. Reality on the other is the true existence state of things rather than their state in imagination or as they were wished to be and remains a fact. Magic fusion on the other hand is the casting and spelling of magic by two different individuals that end at the same time in order to fuse. Orson Welles, a well renowned movie producer and director, uses these pieces of literature in his films to bring out a clear understanding on the post-modern confusion portrayed in journalism and its resultant effects to the communities concerned.
Citizen Kane is a drama film that has had its position at the top ranks in the movie industry for its unique innovation, perfect narrative structuring as well as its music composition. Kane, (Orson Welles) lives a poor childhood life with nothing good in the offing for his future. All he sees is a hopeless future ahead before a sudden twist of events is seen when a potential gold mine is identified on a property the mother owned that never looked any productive. When he finally gets the full control into the newspaper business, he uses enticing information as well employ the best known journalists to enable him rise in his endeavors (Carringer 122). This brings out a greater reader base for his newspaper when in reality it is his way of acquiring power which occurs after the laps of substantial period of time. Through this many private lives of prominent people are exposed to the public. This shows a progressive growth by Welles from a low, poorly cultured individual to his high ranking after his education by Thatcher the mother’s banker.
Can't complete your paper?
Need a quick, creative solution?
Never too late to get it done by our prosWrite My Paper
Welles portrays real situations in his headlines in the newspapers by giving very deep focus on information that tends to attract audience most. This enables Welles to take full control of media and journalism in general. (Carringer 156) .States that according to Welles, when the headline is big then it makes the news big enough. Welles goes ahead to use his second wife to make his way into the political arena showing an essence of gaining social power. The entire scenario in the film portrays a clear view on how spectatorship is used in journalism in place of reality to attract the audience.
‘F for Fake’
F for Fake portrays a picture of a traditional documentary that brings out the basis in the value of art in the film industry. For a long period of time use of magic has been associated with traditional values. This shows the magical inclination of the film in the early contemporary society. Welles performs a sleight of some hand trick with a very young small child. He fascinates the young boy by turning the key the boy has handed over to him into a coin. The film uses trickery and mockery to deceive their audience in believing some aspects in the film that may look extraordinary or in a supernatural state which is a common scenario in art. The three major personalities referred to as Charlatans, Welles, de Hony, and Clifford Irving use their art prowess to create and perform some magnificent forgeries to manipulate the minds of the audience. This is grievous as the individuals gain supremacy and hence called the experts and the elites in the society (Claudia 174). The film also portrays how much literary work may be used in deceiving the general public since the magician is dedicated to manipulate the audience that some magic was performed on the boy to have the key in his pocket while in the real sense the truth of the matter is that the magician may have placed the key in the young boy’s pockets. This shows how the society is deeply rooted into the economic supremacy (Gary and Andrew 170).
The alleged magic gives a perfect illustration of the Welles’ purpose to the film. Although the film is featured as one of the minor films ever produced by Welles, it had a very tremendous impact on film making that also affected the public in both technical and simple senses. Indeed, Welles performed the film during the later periods of his life that is close to his death during the year of 1985. The film is composed of very complex film editing with various stocks and styles that make no sense to a serious literature personality (Claudia 179). The audience is swayed into believing everything as long as it had some form of air in its art literary application. However, it looks very appealing to the unsuspecting audience who may be taking all the events happening therein to be true and real yet they represent the exact opposite. This shows how much irony and paradox is expressed on the works of Welles in wide perspective. Thus is very detrimental to the whole society as the youth or event the adults may pick some lines from the movie and then use them in a very blind and disorganized manner. His original film created a lot of impact in the current film making especially where horror movies are to be made. It is not wrong to say the current film makers use some art criteria in making their movies have an appealing attraction to the unsuspecting public just like it was done in the early years of Welles.
There was a very remarkable progress in the education system in the 1960s since it was centered onto the written word. The learners during this period appreciated the importance of the written word much more than they could imagine. This is because an individual should think critically of their current situations and onto the ways of bettering this existence through the various forms of communication including art.
‘Touch of evil’
Touch of evil, is an American thriller films whose scenes majorly revolve around crime. From its beginning, crime is seen as an obvious occurrence when a bomb is plotted into a car that later explodes killing all its occupants on the spot on the American-Mexican boarder. Investigation is launched by one Mexican drug enforcement officer, Maguel, having in mind the implications associated with such occurrence, the explosion having taken place on the American soil, but with roots on the Mexican soil. On investigations, a possible suspect is interrogated in his house where the police chief, District Attorney and Police Captain in the presence of Maguel the drug official. During the interrogation, a shoe box is found with dynamite in it.
Maguel alleges this as a plot used by Quinlan the police captain to help the suspect escape conviction for his crimes. However much this is disputed on the grounds that he is bias on fellow Mexican. This is a plot to hinder justice from taking course. Grandi, a brother to the suspect is also investigated by Maguel prompting the removal of Susie who happens to be the victim’s daughter. The argument in this case is to escape from the unwanted attention of Grandi, the suspect’s brother. All these happen to conceal the truth from reaching the intended audience. This technique makes the film acquire more attention of the audience that really wants to know what happens next (Leaming 291). The transitions in the film occur in such a way that justice is concealed from the victims in the sense that the people instituted with the responsibility of bringing justice to the affected, appear in the outward perception to be working in order to get to the bottom of the matter, when in the actual sense the help the suspects evade conviction. Even though this happens, the audience is deceived into believing all that happens. The technological advancements have blurred the distinctive line between fiction and facts which have played greatly in affecting the course for justice.
It is however recommended that he next generation should concentrate on the effectiveness of critical thinking attributes. These should incorporate factors like in depth reading, thinking and writing. It would then bring forth a whole community with proper and down to earth activists. These arguments have no consequence in the current society and beyond. Since there exist very limited hope in the fate of higher learning in most educational settings of the world, a need to generate this hope lies in the ability of the individual to face desolate world and the threats involved that are the very urgent realities. Advancements in technology are important and impeccable attributes to the society, but all in all, this attitude of regression at the expense of progression is a worrying matter. The advancements in technology simply drive the human race towards confusing and sickening situations which could otherwise be avoided through the use of the early forms of technology in the early 1990s where technology had a relevant effect onto the lives of individuals in the world without deceit.
It is very clear that Welles’ work is very different from the other producers in the way he discusses topics in a very casual manner to reveal the sensitivities of nature and attract the unsuspecting audience. This is aggravated by the unique skills he employs in the organization of his work. This indeed is very different from other producers and even his other works where he bombards the audience with lots of dense and lexiphanic words which the audience may consult the dictionary very often in order to understand the whole idea in the film.